| Submission declined on 24 July 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 23 July 2025 by Tenshi Hinanawi (talk). Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Declined by Tenshi Hinanawi 17 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined. The reviewer(s) who declined this submission will be listed in the page history. | |
Comment: Noting also that this has been attempted multiple times at Sir Patrick Bijou / Draft:Sir Patrick Bijou / Patrick Bijou / Draft:Patrick Bijou, and deleted at least following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Bijou (which also provides some context for this). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:00, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: I assume the 'Sir' is meant to denote knighthood, rather than being a part of the name? In which case, is there any actual evidence that this person has been knighted? And if so, that he is entitled to use the 'Sir' prefix? The only mention of knighthood I found was in a press release issued by his office, saying that the Sovereign Military Order of Malta has knighted him, but I don't think that makes him a 'Sir', at least not in the UK or Commonwealth countries. Also, such a press release is hardly reliable evidence. He also seems to like referring to himself as 'His Excellency' – what is the basis for that? DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:55, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: The sources are just churnalism, and this draft is pure vanispamcruftisement. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:44, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
 | This article contains paid contributions. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. |