 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,204 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 7 August 2025 by HitroMilanese (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 6 August 2025 by Chaotic Enby (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Chaotic Enby 2 days ago.
| |
Comment: Please see WP:CORPDEPTH. Routine coverage is not enough to demonstrate notability. Also see WP:NCORP. Hitro talk 10:35, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by my employer for my contributions to this article. Spacehit0407 (talk) 10:10, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
| Company type | Private |
|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace engineering |
| Founder | Rafal Jorda Siquier |
| Headquarters | |
Area served | Worldwide |
Number of employees | ~150 (March 2025) |
| Website | www |
Open Cosmos is a satellite mission provider and microsatellite manufacturer, focusing on Earth Observation and satellite communication missions. It was founded by Rafal Jorda Siquier in 2015, and now operates bases in the UK, Spain, Portugal [1] and Greece. Its aims to reduce the cost of access to space.[2]
Open Cosmos has joined forces with Space Park Leicester to support in the development of the Elfen Project, which is a mission aimed at measuring solar winds, and its affect on near earth space.[3]
In September 2023, it was announced that Open Cosmos had raised $50 million in funding from backers ETF Partners, Trill Impact and A&G, along with smaller strategic investors, including Accenture Ventures.[4][5][6]
In July 2025, Open Cosmos acquired Portuguese start-up, Connected, which focuses on 5G NB-IoT capabilities for space.[7]
- ^ "Open Cosmos To Expand Portuguese Footprint". Payload. 4 November 2024.
- ^ "UK start-up aims to slash the cost of satellite launches". The Daily Telegraph. 18 April 2018. Retrieved 7 August 2025.
- ^ "Satellite firm joins space park to track solar wind". BBC News. 20 September 2024.
- ^ "Picture brightens for space start-up Open Cosmos with new funding". The Times. 11 September 2023.
- ^ "Accenture (ACN) Adds Open Cosmos to Its Investment Portfolio". Yahoo! Finance. 12 September 2023.
- ^ "Open Cosmos, a UK satellite startup focused on sustainability, raises $50M". TechCrunch. 11 September 2023.
- ^ "Open Cosmos acquires Connected in landmark European spacetech exit". Tech.eu. 3 July 2025.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.